Fahrenheit Siddhartha and Fahrenheit are very similar in some ways and very different in others this essay will talk about some of these similarities and some of the differences. In order to understand the two books we must first write a detailed summary of them. was published by George Orwell, or Eric Blair, in Fahrenheit was published in by Ray Bradbury. Both are works of dystopian fiction, though of a somewhat different nature. In this essay, I hope to illustrate the differences and similarities between the two novels. Fahrenheit vs. Essay Sample. Fahrenheit and are two different books with a lot of similarities and although written years ago, can still be applicable to the world today. Several conflicting frames of mind have played defining roles in shaping humanity throughout the twentieth century. vs Fahrenheit Cameron Russell Mrs. Flynn ENG 4U 13 December Comparison of ‘’ and ‘Fahrenheit ’ George Orwell’s ‘’, and Ray Bradbury’s ‘Fahrenheit ’, display numerous examples of comparison throughout each novel. Fahrenheit And - The Fear Of Utopia Essay Words 5 Pages Several conflicting frames of mind have played defining roles in shaping humanity throughout the twentieth century.
- ”1984” by George Orwell vs ”Fahrenheit 451” by Ray Bradbury Essay Sample
- 1984 versus Fahrenheit 451 – a comparison
- Fahrenheit 451 vs. 1984 Essay Sample
Download Essay Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals. Get Access Fahrenheit vs.
”1984” by George Orwell vs ”Fahrenheit 451” by Ray Bradbury Essay Sample
Several conflicting frames of mind have played defining roles in shaping humanity throughout the twentieth century. Visions of a bright future held by humanity were taken advantage of by the promise of a better life through the sacrifice of individuality to the state. The trickery and the treachery by both ruling government shows their similarities in their oppressive control and this is very evident in both novels.
The novels by George Orwell and Fahrenheit by Ray Bradbury established the atmosphere of the government control over everything the citizens do—even in what they think. Fear of the consequences of acting in the non-prescribed way is shown through the protagonists, who were the few people in each novel to eventually find the light and what constitutes as a good life, only for it to be their biggest flaw. A single character is alienated because of his inability to conform and accept the laws of society.
The similar fear of the abuse of power and technology of the state at the expense of human individuality, core values etc. Warnings of what society could possibly degenerate to are presented in by George Orwell and in Fahrenheit by Ray Bradbury.
Both novels contain vivid dystopian worlds from which we can see strong resemblances to our present societies and that is the dangers of a controlled government and how visible this control is in both novels. The governments in novels Big Brother and The Party in and The Firemen in Fahrenheit have dominant control over their citizens and they have a lot of similarities in their ways of controlling.
1984 versus Fahrenheit 451 – a comparison
Their want for more and more power is a vivid example of control in the novels. In , this can be seen throughout the novel as the government tries to eliminate everything pleasurable.
According to the ruling party, they try to create a dystopian society where even sex is just a formality and not for pleasure. But in the future there will be no wives and no friends. Children will be taken from their mothers at birth, as one takes eggs from a hen. The sex instinct will be eradicated. Procreation will be an annual formality like the renewal of a ration card.
We shall abolish the orgasm.
Our neurologists are mat work upon it now. Orwell In the novel Fahrenheit the main struggle for power deals with the government. This overly oppressive, almost Orwellian style bureaucracy tries to make sure there is no interaction with books at all. They believe that books permeate their society and corrupt the minds of the people.
On the opposite side of that spectrum, there is a struggle for power by the people as well. There is the woman who hid several thousand volumes of books in her house. She loves these books so much that when the firemen ransacked her house, she went down with the books without hesitation.
She did not care what they were going to do to her. Another example of the similarities is the elements used for control in both novels. In , there were a lot of elements used. Telescreens for example was a very important element in the play. In Fahrenheit , they are fire fighters but instead, they set fire on books and houses that have books. Element of control can clearly be seen there as they do not want people reading books as they believe it only corrupts the mind and according to Beatty the head of the fire department, it always angers some people.
Control is one of the major themes in the novels and Fahrenheit and it is mostly showcased on the government. In Fahrenheit , everything that the government encourages the people to do while at work are just acts of distracting people. They prefer people watching television and driving recklessly on the road to them reading books. Who takes it out of you? She even goes as far as to call them her family.
Brainwashing of minds was one of the main objectives of both governments in the novels and all of these were just in an attempt once again to keep power.
In , the audience can relate to this due to the comparable suffering both Julia and Winston went through in the play. And due to the harsh treatments, they were forced to betray each other.
She gave him another quick look of dislike. At the time when it happens you do mean it. You want it to happen to the other person. All you care about is yourself. They oppressed him a lot and an example of where that can be seen is when Beatty forces him to burn his house and then Beatty places him under arrest. When Beatty continues to berate Montag, Montag turns the flamethrower on his superior and proceeds to burn him to ashes.
Montag knocks the other firemen unconscious and runs. Montag manages to destroy it with his flamethrower; then he walks off the numbness in his leg and escapes with some books that were hidden in his backyard.
Both the freedom from ignorance of the protagonists eventually changes their behaviours from law abiding to law breaking citizens and it also led to their new understanding of what constituted life. Montag is a fireman and in the novel, the firefighters are a disciplinary force in society that actually starts fires instead of stopping them.
Being part of the group that burns books would seem to those around him as a poor candidate for breaking the law and reading them. Eventually, however, there is a change in Montag, and he starts to desire for the knowledge, awareness and opportunity that he thinks books can provide. Montag proceeds to break the law by reading as many books as he can.
Winston in is also a familiar character that Fahrenheit produced; the protagonist breaks the law by committing thought crime which is the worst type of crime to commit. He commits this thought crime when he started writing his diary on page 8.
An important or perhaps the most important theme that occurs in the essay is that of destruction of human values. In both novels, a human value seems to have been diminished to the lowest level. In , there are almost no human values left in most of the people of the society and that is how Big Brother likes it. I think it spoils it when they tie their feet together.
Syme believes that it is okay for people to be hanged and it is not fun when their legs are tied.
Fahrenheit 451 vs. 1984 Essay Sample
This is just to show you the extent to which human values are no longer revered. They kill each other. Did he always use to be that way? Bradbury 30 The control of the government over its citizens is all so eminent here that almost all if not all have been vanquished and both government sees nothing wrong with it.
On the contrary, they like it.
The novels offer different details on interesting scenarios, but they share similarities in their leaders, the control over their people and the destruction of human values. Even though these stories were written around , they are still quite applicable to the world today.
The popularity of these books does rule out the possibility of such a society coming into existence in the future, however, the dangers of a controlled government and how visible it is in both novels should issue a wake-up call to society on how dangerous controlled governments and how almost impossible it is to get rid of them.
More essays like this: