Discuss the ways in which Religious Experience can be distinguished from ordinary experience. Religious experience is the self witness or experience of God's Holy Spirit, or other mystical experiences. It is a non empirical occurrence and may be super natural. It can be an experience /5(9). Religious Experience Essay - Religious Experience There are various interpretations of the definite meaning of a religious experience, where each are unique and different. There have been many, many stores put forward by certain individuals who have claimed to have such an experience. Here is the second of two essays on religious experience by students that were on the A/B borderline. Again in this essay my annotation in italics helps explain my allocation of marks, which I have put at the end. This essay, although slightly weaker in its evaluation and conclusion, is stronger overall, as I think. - The Argument from Religious Experience The argument from religious experience is the argument that personal religious experiences can prove God’s existence to those that have them. One can only perceive that which exists, and so God must exist because there are those that have experienced him. ‘The best way to God is through religious experience.’ Discuss. What arguments am I best using in this essay? Would it be better to argue against religious experience by providing alternatives or by criticising religious experience itself? Any ideas would be greatly appreciated! Thank you.
- A level religious experience essays
- Religious Experience essay by a student
- Religious Experience essay by a student (Number Two)
Again in this essay my annotation in italics helps explain my allocation of marks, which I have put at the end. Discuss the view that religious experiences must be true because there is a common core to all of them. He created four criteria. It would appear that all religious experiences demonstrate a revelation of truth, but one could argue that this does not indicate they are true.
A level religious experience essays
It would be good to see some reference to other believers in a common core, such as Otto or Swinburne. Secondly, James states that they must be transient; religious experiences must occur over a short temporal distance and cannot be permanent. This significantly hinders his initial premise that religious experiences all share common characteristics, and thus his entire argument appears relatively weak.
Particularly when we think of an ineffable and transient event, this seems almost impossible to get exterior agents of a sound mind to corroborate and verify sufficiently.
In this regard, their common ineffable core strengthens the plausibility of religious experiences.
Religious Experience essay by a student
There is much more to say here, and some useful criticism of this idea comes from Steven Katz. The student needs to say. However, other philosophers have challenged the accuracy of this claim. Not sure if the Toronto Blessing is the strongest example to use here!
It is worth noting that the criteria is relatively vague and ambiguous, and therefore may substantiate many types of religious experience without necessarily identifying a common core. Furthermore, if we regard this criteria strictly, we will simply dismiss some experiences as non-religious experiences i.
However, such examples ought to otherwise be considered as religious experience. Furthermore, even if a common core does present itself, this does not necessarily imply they are true. For example, no Catholic has reported seeing Brahma at Lourdes.
Religious Experience essay by a student (Number Two)
However, as aforementioned, it is possible — as Jung suggests — for God to be using our subconscious minds to communicate, and the common core of these experiences does strongly suggest a direct common cause. Thus, it seems more viable to conclude that such experiences are true. There do not seem to be strong enough reasons given here to conclude the last line of this paragraph.
However, as William Lane Craig dictates, this would in some ways imply religious experiences are self-authenticating, owing to their extremely transformative nature; since the effect is so positive and affirmative, it could be argued as evidence for the belief in an omnibenevolent, interventionist God.